
Aquatic Ape Theory - What is it? A Brief Summary of AAT - key arguments A Brief History and Key Proponents of AAT Ape to Human Evolution Timeline Alternative theories of human evolution Wikipedia and the scientific community . Homo Ancestors . Testable Hypotheses |
Fingers, hands, feet and toesFingersIn January 2013 scientists discovered a possible explanation for why the skin on human fingers and toes shrivels up like an old prune when we soak in the bath. Laboratory tests confirmed that wrinkly fingers improve our grip on wet or submerged objects, probably working to channel away the water like the rain treads in car tires. It is often wrongly assumed that wrinkling is the result of water passing into the outer layer of the skin and making it swell up, but researchers have known since the 1930s that the effect does not occur when there is nerve damage in the fingers. This shows that the change is an involuntary reaction by the body's autonomic nervous system — the system that also controls breathing, heart rate and perspiration. In fact, the distinctive wrinkling is caused by blood vessels constricting below the skin. |
![]() |
![]() |
These adaptations are treated as deformities or a mutations and surgery is usually offered to correct it.
Webbed hands and feet may provide some advantage to swimmers. Even the most fully aquatic mammals such as whales have similar hand and finger bones which are all that remain of their once terrestrial limbs. Their hind legs appear during fetal development but then disappear before birth.
Fossilised hand bones of Ardi ramidus |
Xray image of blue whale flipper |
Skeleton image of manatee flipper.
|
Human beings have flat, arched soles, with short toes. They are quite different from the feet of other primates, which generally have much longer digits (toes) and an opposable big toe, which makes them quite suitable for grasping and climbing, like the hands. We have lost much of the use of our toes, for anything other than providing balance when we walk. Human feet are ideal for two things: walking on soft, wet, infirm terrain such as swampy mud, lake bottoms, sand and shingle (where hooved animals are more likely to sink or slip); and for swimming. Our flatter, moe 'paddle-like' feet are better able to provide thrust when we swim, yet they have not started to turn into flukes or flippers that fully aquatic animals have. Modern human swimmers or divers benefit greatly from the extra thrust provided when wearing artificial flippers or fins, but this is just an extension of what we already have. Anyone who has tried to walk on land in this equipment knows it is not practical, so our ancestors made a pay off between feet ideal for swimming and feet ideal for wading or walking on land.
Although the soles of our feet tend to harden over time when accustomed to going barefoot, they are still much more vulnerable to injury than thick padded paws of many carnivores, or the hard, narrow hooves of much of their prey. This suggests that our feet are not well adapted to running across the savannah or other hard surfaces, but very well adapted to a life spent wading and shallow-dive harvesting /fishing on the seashore or in rivers and lakes.
![]() |
![]() |
Further observations:
Of course, today, our feet are used for walking & running, but that doesn¹t mean that our foot evolved from a chimp-like foot for walking-running (a
fortiori endurance-running). In fact, prenatal chimps have more humanlike feet according to Coon (with relatively long and forward pointing big toes), which only after birth become more hand-like.
Our foot¹s unexpectedly long and strong first and last digital rays are seen in swimmers (sealions, penguins) & perhaps waders (although these typically have more divergent digital rays), but cursorials have long and strong middle digital rays (e.g. 3 in equids, 3-4 in carnivores and artiodactyls, toe loss in ostriches & horses).
Our feet seem to have evolved from climbing- to swimming-feet (aquarboreal, later littoral) to wading-walking feet. Chimpanzee feet from climbing to aquarboreal to climbing-walking feet?
‹marc
Homo or Australopithecus Naledi's forefeet resembled a modern human's - only a bit flatter and with more curved toes. The foot structure suggests the hominin waded or swam.
Cursorial bipedal animals such as ostriches have digitigrade feet with very robust and long central digital rays, whereas wading bipedal animals such as flamingoes have flatter feet with relatively longer first and last digital rays. This raises the question whether the flat human foot originally evolved for wading in very shallow waters, and only secondarily evolved for walking or running on terra firma.
In naledi the combination of flat and fully plantigrade feet (broadly similar to that of modern humans) with curved hand phalanges which might suggest a locomotion not unlike that of bonobos or lowland gorillas who occasionally or regularly wade in shallow forest swamps or wetlands for waterlilies or sedges, but more frequently. The strongly curved manual phalanges in combination with the gorilla-like pedal curvatures suggest they also frequently climbed in the branches above or near the swamp.
If naledi spent a lot of time in wetlands or forest swamps in considerable densities as seen in lowland gorillas collecting aquatic herbaceous vegetation in forest bais, this might possibly also explain their accumulation and fossilisation in mudstone, without having to assume deliberate burials in caves.
[Marc Verhaegen / AAT group]
Disclaimer: This site is currently under construction. Every effort has been (will be!) made to trace the copyright owners of any images or text used on this site to request permission and to give proper credit. If you are the copyright holder of any images, files or text and have not been contacted, please contact the webmaster in order to rectify this.